Comments on: Using Bundler 0.9.4 with Rails 2.3.5 http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/ Bringing fun back to the web. Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:59:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Phil http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5717 Phil Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:25:17 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5717 Works great for me and integrates with Heroku! Thanks! Works great for me and integrates with Heroku! Thanks!

]]> By: Bundler and Rubygems Again : Admoo Labs http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5716 Bundler and Rubygems Again : Admoo Labs Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:18:25 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5716 [...] my previous post, I showed you how to use bundler with rails 2.3.5. Bundler is used to install the gems, and [...] [...] my previous post, I showed you how to use bundler with rails 2.3.5. Bundler is used to install the gems, and [...]

]]> By: crigor http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5715 crigor Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:00:53 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5715 We're not using bundler to load the gems, we only use it to install them. Thus, you might encounter dependency resolution issues.<br><br>Can you try changing config/preinitializer.rb to <br><br>bundler_gems = File.expand_path('../../vendor/bundler_gems/gems', __FILE__)<br>if File.exist?(bundler_gems)<br> Dir["#{bundler_gems}/*/lib"].each { |path| $:.unshift(path) }<br>end<br><br>Then use require 'active_merchant', instead of gem 'activemerchant'. We're not using bundler to load the gems, we only use it to install them. Thus, you might encounter dependency resolution issues.

Can you try changing config/preinitializer.rb to

bundler_gems = File.expand_path('../../vendor/bundler_gems/gems', __FILE__)
if File.exist?(bundler_gems)
Dir["#{bundler_gems}/*/lib"].each { |path| $:.unshift(path) }
end

Then use require 'active_merchant', instead of gem 'activemerchant'.

]]> By: collintmiller http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5714 collintmiller Sun, 14 Feb 2010 01:59:50 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5714 This doesn't work for me. Using this strategy loads the wrong versions of gems from my ~/.gem directory. It is in fact very much like not using bundler at all. This doesn't work for me. Using this strategy loads the wrong versions of gems from my ~/.gem directory. It is in fact very much like not using bundler at all.

]]> By: julian7 http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5713 julian7 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:16:13 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5713 If you develop your code on a different os than the one you use for deployment, you won't be able to deploy vendor/bundler_gems. You have an option for this in bundler, called 'bundle pack', but otherwise you don't have to do that. If you develop your code on a different os than the one you use for deployment, you won't be able to deploy vendor/bundler_gems. You have an option for this in bundler, called 'bundle pack', but otherwise you don't have to do that.

]]> By: crigor http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5712 crigor Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:35:59 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5712 What do you mean by not portable? What do you mean by not portable?

]]> By: julian7 http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5711 julian7 Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:09:21 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5711 Well, easy, and not portable. Well, easy, and not portable.

]]> By: Etienne Vallette d'Osia http://blog.admoolabs.com/using-bundler-0-9-4-with-rails-2-3-5/comment-page-1/#comment-5710 Etienne Vallette d'Osia Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:59:25 +0000 http://blog.admoolabs.com/?p=160#comment-5710 Easy and clean, I like it :-) Easy and clean, I like it :-)

]]>